Congratulations to the Hawkins County Rescue Squad on receiving a great grant of $87,360.25! They added an extra $3,644.31 of their own money, made possible by the Tennessee Rescue Squad Grant Program. New extrication gear, water rescue stuff, rope rescue equipment… the whole nine yards. On the surface, that looks like a good deal for all parties involved. More equipment, better trained medical rescue teams, more people saved—sounds good doesn’t it?

Here’s where my blockchain background (yes, really—bear with me!) As an industry, we are obsessed with efficiency in the crypto space. We want to bring you more bang for your buck, while eliminating the middleman. Because wasted resources not only reduce our effectiveness, but they represent lost opportunity for everyone.

Is This Really Best Use Of Funds?

This new grant program, although well-intentioned, reeks of inefficient boondoggle. Over $23,000 on rope rescue equipment? A full set of Hurst E2 eDraulic extrication tools. Don't get me wrong, that's great stuff. Is that really the best use of taxpayer dollars to spend almost $90,000 for each rescue squad? So let’s put great, equitable thought into maximizing the impact of this investment. 95 agencies got a grant!

Think about it this way: what if that money were invested in, say, a state-wide public awareness campaign on safe driving practices? Alternately, imagine if that money was spent improving our technology for emergency location services in the first place.

Wouldn’t these investments take a proactive approach to preventing accidents even before they occur, and save more lives in the long run? What if we allocated some of that grant funding to train more volunteers? Rather than buy another piece of equipment, we could invest in teaching people useful skills.

This grant program was conceived in 2022, and funded for the first time at $3 million. And second, it just seems like it would foster a long term reliance on government largess.

  • Improved 911 Infrastructure: Upgrading technology to pinpoint caller locations more accurately, especially in rural areas, could drastically reduce response times.
  • Drone Technology: Investing in drone programs for search and rescue operations, equipped with thermal imaging, could cover vast areas quickly and efficiently.
  • Advanced Data Analytics: Analyzing rescue data to identify high-risk areas and implement targeted prevention strategies.

What occurs when the federal grant dollars evaporate? Are rescue squads dependent on this funding stream? If they do, they’ll watch as the local fundraising efforts—their lifeblood for decades—dry up. Will these new rescue squads have the capacity to care for the expensive equipment they’re buying?

The Unseen Cost Of Dependence

Think about it: small towns, rural communities, they pride themselves on self-reliance. This type of funding, though very much appreciated in the short term, would do so and ultimately undermine that spirit. It’s the equivalent of the old teach a man to fish adage.

Let's be honest, these grants often come with strings attached, even if they're not immediately obvious. Filing compliance requirements and reporting obligations can be a huge burden. They waste hours and dollars per day, taking our first responders away from their primary life-saving mission.

Now, please don’t misinterpret, I’m not arguing that the Tennessee Rescue Squad Grant Program is a bad idea. The intention is good. Yet I am asking if it is the best use of taxpayer dollars.

Often, these types of programs seem like political theater as opposed to real answers. A politician can stand up and say, "Look what I did for our brave rescue workers!" It sounds great on the campaign trail. But does it really result in a quantifiable increase in rescue performance?

Political Points vs. Practical Results?

So my claim is that I’ve only seen anecdotal or vague soft data indicating these grants are really saving lives and decreasing serious injuries. How much has the program affected the change? And what metrics will be used to judge its success?

So let’s stop this practice of just throwing money at a problem and wishing it would be solved. Let's be smart. Let's be strategic. And for God’s sake, let’s do it in a way that saves lives and not just serves as political fodder. Because at the end of the day, that’s what it’s all about. If not, we are simply purchasing votes with taxpayer dollars.

I haven't seen any hard data proving that these grants are significantly reducing fatalities or serious injuries. Have studies been conducted to assess the program's impact? What metrics are being used to evaluate its success?

I'd like to see:

  • Transparency: Publicly available data on the program's impact, including rescue response times, injury rates, and lives saved.
  • Accountability: A clear process for evaluating the effectiveness of the equipment purchased with grant funds.
  • Flexibility: Allowing rescue squads to use grant funds for training, public awareness campaigns, or other initiatives that address their specific needs.

Let's not just throw money at a problem and hope it goes away. Let's be smart. Let's be strategic. And let's make sure we're actually saving lives, not just scoring political points. Because in the end, that's what really matters. Otherwise, we are just buying votes using tax payer's money.