This one always gets me excited and immediately raises my deep, cynical DeFi skepticism. We've been burned before, haven't we? Kana Labs has recently launched the Kana Perps DEX on Aptos. This newest competitor intends to offer its investors a cheaper and less complicated trading experience. Is it really as revolutionary as they say, or another well packaged, artificially inflated hype cycle that’s going to die out? Let's pull back the curtain.

Gasless: Really Gasless, Or Smoke Mirrors?

So right off the bat the claim of “gasless” trading already sounds fishy. Gas – the transaction fees on a blockchain – isn’t going away all of a sudden. Someone, somewhere, is footing the bill. The question is: who, and at what cost? Kana Labs hasn't been entirely transparent about how they're achieving this gasless nirvana.

If Kana Labs is subsidizing gas costs via a single, central entity, that adds a point of centralization risk right there. It brings into sharp question about the long-term viability and sustainability of the model. What happens when funding dries up? Are users going to be blindsided by outrageous charges? Sure, it’s easy to put in giveaways when venture capital is gushing, but what’s the plan when the money dries up? This reminds me of the earliest dot com boom. Remember all those other “free” dial-up internet companies that went under just as fast?

CLOB: Innovation Or Reinventing The Square Wheel?

The move toward a Central Limit Order Book (CLOB) model is an interesting one. It’s a big departure from the Automated Market Maker (AMM) supremacy that has existed in the DeFi world. In principle, on the surface, it provides greater, deeper liquidity and therefore a more familiar trading experience for institutional veterans. Familiar isn't always better.

No matter their faults, AMMs presented a permissionless and decentralized approach to liquidity provision. CLOBs rely on order matching and market makers to provide efficiency. They are even more powerful when the underlying infrastructure is robust and the market place is efficient and liquid. That "if" is a big one. Kana Perps is powered by Econia, an on-chain infrastructure that aggregates liquidity, and leverages Aptos’ Block-STM for ultra-fast settlement. Aptos claims to have extremely high throughput. Nevertheless, we have yet to observe how the system manages peak use and possible network overload.

I see an entirely unexpected connection to the traditional stock market here. CLOBs are the structure upon which exchanges such as the NYSE and NASDAQ are built. Those exchanges have their own infrastructure, regulatory oversight, and armies of engineers at their disposal. Even if this process could be decentralized, could a decentralized platform really match that performance and availability? Well, I worry that Kana Labs might be making this unnecessarily complicated. Even with their peculiarities, AMMs have done this in a much more elegant, uncomplicated, trustless way.

Zero Maker Fees: Genius Or Market Manipulation?

The solution of the 0% maker fee is a bold move and perhaps an even double-edged sword. On the one hand, it rewards liquidity providers for providing depth to the order book. Conversely, it creates a breeding ground for excessive wash trading.

Wash trading has become a pervasive practice in the cryptocurrency industry. Wash trading occurs when traders simultaneously buy and sell the same asset to create the illusion of increased trading volume. Since there are currently no penalties for creators, there is in effect no deterrent to participating in this clickbait-y scam. This adds to a phantom volume market making strategy that exaggerates actual market activity and can even deceive other traders.

Think about it: a malicious actor could create multiple accounts, place offsetting buy and sell orders, and generate massive volumes with minimal cost. This would lure in unwary traders who would think the market is much more liquid and active than it really is. It’s a little bit like a mirage in the desert – looks good, but turns out to be vapor. The isolated margin model and order types RMO risk management are solid tools. Can they actually protect against a concerted attack from a serious adversary?

Kana Labs’ decision to build on Aptos makes for even more intriguing second choice. Aptos, with its capacity for extremely high throughput and unique Block-STM engine, enables high-speed, low-cost transactions. It’s a dangerous, new, untested blockchain. It simply lacks the battle-tested resilience and network effects of Ethereum, for instance.

Order TypeFee
Taker0.05%
Maker0% (plus gas fees, if any)

Aptos: A Blessing Or A Curse?

Aptos has been the subject of regular criticism for how apparently centralized it is and its close connection to VC. This, in turn, heightens concerns over long-term governance of the platform and the dangers of increased centralization. Moreover, as a libertarian, I’m suspicious of any system that puts too much faith in centralized authorities. True DeFi should be permissionless and censorship-resistant.

Did Aptos’s emphasis on speed and efficiency have to be at the cost of decentralization? It’s a tough trade-off that Kana Labs, and its users, will have to weigh thoughtfully.

Kana Labs’ Kana Perps DEX is a pretty ambitious project with quite a few very interesting features. The gasless trading, CLOB model, 0% maker-fees and more are specifically created to attract traders and liquidity providers. The risks, downsides and dangers are just as significant.

The Verdict: Proceed With Caution

Before diving in, ask yourself: Are you comfortable with the potential centralization risks associated with gasless transactions? So how do you feel about the idea that Aptos will be able to fulfill all these promises on speed and scalability. Looking to avoid market manipulation from the 0% maker fee?

Kana Perps will need to address these obstacles in order to thrive. It needs to build a marketplace that really is decentralized, transparent and easy to use. I remain cautiously optimistic about these developments. I’m a long way from believing that this is the DeFi revolution we’ve all been hoping for. Maybe it will turn out to be one more passing vaporware, consigned to the tomb of failed hypes. Only time will tell.

Ultimately, the success of Kana Perps will depend on its ability to address these challenges and build a truly decentralized, transparent, and user-friendly trading platform. For now, I remain cautiously optimistic, but far from convinced that this is the DeFi revolution we've been waiting for. It could just be another hype cycle, destined to fade into obscurity. Only time will tell.